<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating Realistic Monsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/09/17/creating-realistic-monsters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/09/17/creating-realistic-monsters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Repose</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/09/17/creating-realistic-monsters/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Repose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=938#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I was gonna go on a list about how I sort of banged this out rather sloppily, but instead, I will simply take the complement.   Thank you.

Though now I have inadvertently replied with that which I said I wasn&#039;t gonna say to begin with.   If I had a super villain, it seems, it would be myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was gonna go on a list about how I sort of banged this out rather sloppily, but instead, I will simply take the complement.   Thank you.</p>
<p>Though now I have inadvertently replied with that which I said I wasn&#8217;t gonna say to begin with.   If I had a super villain, it seems, it would be myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeen</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/09/17/creating-realistic-monsters/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>jeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=938#comment-145</guid>
		<description>RYN I have an interesting dilemma.  In the world of blogs, you would respond to a note in your blog itself.  In OD, a response to a note is done on the noter&#039;s diary.  Here our worlds collide.  Where do I respond to your notes, here or in my own entry?  Which would you prefer?

Anyway, I assume your note was referring to the vagueness of my entries.  I sound vague because (1) I am currently writing for myself and no one else, although I don&#039;t mind if others enjoy reading what I write.  (2) I am writing to work out my own confused feelings.  If you think the entries are vague, you should see how they start out in my mind.  By the end I usually feel clearer (3) I am sometimes working out concepts that cause me embarrassment, even shame and guilt.  So they are sometimes hidden even from myself.  Giving myself permission to play with words allows me to see what I hide from myself.  

Hope the vagueness doesn&#039;t frustrate you.  Don&#039;t feel obliged to keep reading mine just because I read yours :)  (Which i&#039;m enjoying btw).  If you do, I would recommend you just allow yourself to sense the feelings and impressions without worrying about concepts, facts or details.  Or approach it as you would a surrealist work.  Dali&#039;s melting clocks was either a very inaccurate depiction of clocks, or a very true depiction of the fluidity of time.  I generally don&#039;t care if what you read is different from what I write.  Remember what you yourself said, that people don&#039;t always remember what you write but they sure remember how you make them feel.  

The looming silence was a device I was using to refer to all of the following: my lack of entries; my slipping into depression; the sense of isolation that accompanied the depression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RYN I have an interesting dilemma.  In the world of blogs, you would respond to a note in your blog itself.  In OD, a response to a note is done on the noter&#8217;s diary.  Here our worlds collide.  Where do I respond to your notes, here or in my own entry?  Which would you prefer?</p>
<p>Anyway, I assume your note was referring to the vagueness of my entries.  I sound vague because (1) I am currently writing for myself and no one else, although I don&#8217;t mind if others enjoy reading what I write.  (2) I am writing to work out my own confused feelings.  If you think the entries are vague, you should see how they start out in my mind.  By the end I usually feel clearer (3) I am sometimes working out concepts that cause me embarrassment, even shame and guilt.  So they are sometimes hidden even from myself.  Giving myself permission to play with words allows me to see what I hide from myself.  </p>
<p>Hope the vagueness doesn&#8217;t frustrate you.  Don&#8217;t feel obliged to keep reading mine just because I read yours <img src='http://www.nonpersons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Which i&#8217;m enjoying btw).  If you do, I would recommend you just allow yourself to sense the feelings and impressions without worrying about concepts, facts or details.  Or approach it as you would a surrealist work.  Dali&#8217;s melting clocks was either a very inaccurate depiction of clocks, or a very true depiction of the fluidity of time.  I generally don&#8217;t care if what you read is different from what I write.  Remember what you yourself said, that people don&#8217;t always remember what you write but they sure remember how you make them feel.  </p>
<p>The looming silence was a device I was using to refer to all of the following: my lack of entries; my slipping into depression; the sense of isolation that accompanied the depression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeen</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/09/17/creating-realistic-monsters/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>jeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=938#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Hmmm really well thought out analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm really well thought out analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

