<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nonpersons.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nonpersons.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Watches the Watchmen Who Watch The Watchmen&#8217;s Watchers? by Mr. Repose</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/03/06/who-watchs-the-watchmen-who-watch-the-watchmens-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Repose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=493#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Blackmuse, I know you may think the word &#039;nigger&#039; will earn you &#039;edgy&#039; points for your flame cred when you eventually tell the fucking morons at BH about this site (assuming you haven&#039;t already), but it just makes me think you&#039;re a fucking idiot.  GTFO Snarfmon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blackmuse, I know you may think the word &#8216;nigger&#8217; will earn you &#8216;edgy&#8217; points for your flame cred when you eventually tell the fucking morons at BH about this site (assuming you haven&#8217;t already), but it just makes me think you&#8217;re a fucking idiot.  GTFO Snarfmon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Watches the Watchmen Who Watch The Watchmen&#8217;s Watchers? by StinkyWinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/03/06/who-watchs-the-watchmen-who-watch-the-watchmens-watchers/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>StinkyWinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=493#comment-344</guid>
		<description>The thing about Watchmen is the book comes in a big yellow and black trade paperback. People don&#039;t like that kind of thing. If the book came in a, say, buttercup yellow then I wouldn&#039;t have a problem, no sir. But the fact that the book looks like crap just solidifies the fact that the Watchmen are sand niggers.

I know that probably sounds crazy to you, but give me a moment to explain.

Dr. Manhattan is blue. We all know about Smurfs, Nightcrawler, and The Predator (all blue), but what most of us DON&#039;T know about is the elusive and much more obscure Watchmen nigger. In one quote for the Watchmen TPB (hidden behind a flap of fried chicken) there is actually a picture of this Watchmen nigger riding a go-kart that runs on the dreams of orphans (it goes fast). And that, my friends, is why I like porridge.

Ok, that&#039;s the last comment I&#039;m going to make. huahahahahau lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about Watchmen is the book comes in a big yellow and black trade paperback. People don&#8217;t like that kind of thing. If the book came in a, say, buttercup yellow then I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem, no sir. But the fact that the book looks like crap just solidifies the fact that the Watchmen are sand niggers.</p>
<p>I know that probably sounds crazy to you, but give me a moment to explain.</p>
<p>Dr. Manhattan is blue. We all know about Smurfs, Nightcrawler, and The Predator (all blue), but what most of us DON&#8217;T know about is the elusive and much more obscure Watchmen nigger. In one quote for the Watchmen TPB (hidden behind a flap of fried chicken) there is actually a picture of this Watchmen nigger riding a go-kart that runs on the dreams of orphans (it goes fast). And that, my friends, is why I like porridge.</p>
<p>Ok, that&#8217;s the last comment I&#8217;m going to make. huahahahahau lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Killing Literature, One Fang at a Time by StinkyWinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/07/07/killing-literature-one-fang-at-a-time/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>StinkyWinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=839#comment-343</guid>
		<description>One thing I have to defend is the vampires. They don&#039;t know what they&#039;re doing, so why rant about &#039;em? They didn&#039;t write the books. I&#039;m actually kind of mad at this post because I feel that it brings the &quot;vamps,&quot; if you will, into a negative LIGHT. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Anyway... I like porridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I have to defend is the vampires. They don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing, so why rant about &#8216;em? They didn&#8217;t write the books. I&#8217;m actually kind of mad at this post because I feel that it brings the &#8220;vamps,&#8221; if you will, into a negative LIGHT. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; I like porridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Death Knights: Not to be taken seriously. by StinkyWinkle</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2010/02/10/death-knights-not-to-be-taken-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>StinkyWinkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=1069#comment-342</guid>
		<description>What the porridge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the porridge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There&#8217;s a Cuddle Party, and YOU&#8217;RE invited! by Tuck</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/04/21/theres-a-cuddle-party-and-youre-invited/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=764#comment-328</guid>
		<description>I wanna go to a Cuddle Party. How come nobody has never invited me to a Cuddle Party? I can cuddle :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna go to a Cuddle Party. How come nobody has never invited me to a Cuddle Party? I can cuddle <img src='http://www.nonpersons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monolithic Horizon &#8211; Station to Station by Marci Hediger</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/01/04/monolithic-horizon-station-to-station/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Marci Hediger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=29#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Extraordinary piece you have created here! The web is full of miserable authorship and I was taken hold of by your clarity. Your endings are precise and I will straightaway subscribe to your rss feed to stay up to date with your up forthcoming postings. Yes! I accept it, your writing style is grand and i need to improve on mine unquestionably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extraordinary piece you have created here! The web is full of miserable authorship and I was taken hold of by your clarity. Your endings are precise and I will straightaway subscribe to your rss feed to stay up to date with your up forthcoming postings. Yes! I accept it, your writing style is grand and i need to improve on mine unquestionably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trends to boggle the mind! by Paul Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/02/26/trends-to-boggle-the-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=447#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm that&#039;s cool. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm that&#8217;s cool. <img src='http://www.nonpersons.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Radio Silence by jeen</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/12/10/radio-silence/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>jeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=1056#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a good strategy to me.  Seems to be working for you anyways.  Balls deep eh?
You&#039;ve described two scenarios and implied a third here.  First, don&#039;t finish the book and never know if you&#039;d have succeeded or failed.  Second, finish the book to confirmed &#039;failure&#039; if it doesn&#039;t go anywhere.  Presumably the third implied scenario is screaming success.  There is at least one other scenario.  That regardless of whether the book does well or not, you learn something valuable from having gone through the experience and write a better next book, or find that true calling whatever it may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good strategy to me.  Seems to be working for you anyways.  Balls deep eh?<br />
You&#8217;ve described two scenarios and implied a third here.  First, don&#8217;t finish the book and never know if you&#8217;d have succeeded or failed.  Second, finish the book to confirmed &#8216;failure&#8217; if it doesn&#8217;t go anywhere.  Presumably the third implied scenario is screaming success.  There is at least one other scenario.  That regardless of whether the book does well or not, you learn something valuable from having gone through the experience and write a better next book, or find that true calling whatever it may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Scorpion and The Frog by Mr. Repose</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/10/18/the-scorpion-and-the-frog/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Repose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=1028#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Forgive the lengthiness again, but you&#039;re right I didn&#039;t really say what I feel would &#039;fix&#039; the problem, so I&#039;ll go into that a little.

Well there&#039;s a few major problems when you look at a corporation, one is the legal protections they have which is generally stemmed from the fact that they are considered for all intents and purposes as a legal &#039;person.&#039;  That, I feel needs to go, because it&#039;s absolutely ridiculous and gives them too much room to maneuver out of being held accountable when they do damage to society.  Another is the fact that they used to have a limit for how long they would operate, a corporation would exist for only a set duration and only be around to preform a specific goal and was given this power by the citizens of the town, city, state, whatever, that that corporation started in.  Therefore, a business of that size that impacts society that greatly should probably be given those mandates again, and be subject to public review.  If a corporation is viewed as dangerous by the public or does major harm to them, they can vote to have it disbanded.

The other problem is the legal mandate to consider only the shareholder&#039;s interests above anything else.  Which, I think, was put in law in order to give them an excuse to totally disregard the general well-being of the communities they impact and the workers that, as I see it, are being increasingly exploited.  I&#039;m a big proponent of socialism, because it&#039;s more fair for everyone involved.  Of course, I don&#039;t expect it to ever happen because It&#039;s been turned into a demon word in this country by people who are ignorant and confuse it for communism.   Rather than a company taking the bulk of it&#039;s profits and giving it to the executives, I think that the workers deserve a much bigger cut.   No one can live on 7 to 12 bucks an hour and have much savings let alone own a home or raise a family on those wages, and without the rank and file workers, the company couldn&#039;t operate.  There, however, seems to be this strange contempt held by many for anyone who thinks that workers deserve more, so that remains a pipe dream.

An overhaul of the lobbying system is a good start, the marriage between power and money is very dangerous, and the erosion of federal regulations for big business seems to go hand-in-hand with the amount of money spent on lobbying efforts, and the amount of money that is needed to win an election.   Politicians who need money to run for office have to get corporate sponsorship to get into office.  The result is that no politician, or very few, are not pro-business.  Even if they say they aren&#039;t the things they do in office don&#039;t do all that much to fix anything because they are so beholden to the very thing they try to convince the public they are against.   A good example of this is the democrats, who voted down the bailouts and after some back room deals with the very people who screwed up the economy in the first place, turn around and vote to give them total access to the federal reserve with no oversight and no way of asking them where the money is going.   Or again, with healthcare, they talk about how bad the insurance companies are, then when they go to have a public option that the majority of the public supports, then they gut it, make it insignificant, and even give states a choice to opt out of it.   Which is great if you&#039;re stuck in a red state like me because you know we&#039;ll opt-out.

Also, they need to start taxing these people more.  The taxes were lifted based on trickle down economics, which obviously hasn&#039;t worked.  The more money they let these people keep, the more they seem to horde it.   It&#039;s almost like an addiction, a whole class of people obsessed with having gobs of money.  

Those things I feel would significantly reduce the power of businesses and restore a balance.   If things keep going the way they are, which I feel they will continue to do so, then I&#039;m fairly sure the other 99% of the country is going to become increasingly more miserable.  I&#039;m also fairly realistic in the knowledge that a lot of these things are becoming increasingly unlikely to occur.  Still, that doesn&#039;t mean we should all just bend over and take it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive the lengthiness again, but you&#8217;re right I didn&#8217;t really say what I feel would &#8216;fix&#8217; the problem, so I&#8217;ll go into that a little.</p>
<p>Well there&#8217;s a few major problems when you look at a corporation, one is the legal protections they have which is generally stemmed from the fact that they are considered for all intents and purposes as a legal &#8216;person.&#8217;  That, I feel needs to go, because it&#8217;s absolutely ridiculous and gives them too much room to maneuver out of being held accountable when they do damage to society.  Another is the fact that they used to have a limit for how long they would operate, a corporation would exist for only a set duration and only be around to preform a specific goal and was given this power by the citizens of the town, city, state, whatever, that that corporation started in.  Therefore, a business of that size that impacts society that greatly should probably be given those mandates again, and be subject to public review.  If a corporation is viewed as dangerous by the public or does major harm to them, they can vote to have it disbanded.</p>
<p>The other problem is the legal mandate to consider only the shareholder&#8217;s interests above anything else.  Which, I think, was put in law in order to give them an excuse to totally disregard the general well-being of the communities they impact and the workers that, as I see it, are being increasingly exploited.  I&#8217;m a big proponent of socialism, because it&#8217;s more fair for everyone involved.  Of course, I don&#8217;t expect it to ever happen because It&#8217;s been turned into a demon word in this country by people who are ignorant and confuse it for communism.   Rather than a company taking the bulk of it&#8217;s profits and giving it to the executives, I think that the workers deserve a much bigger cut.   No one can live on 7 to 12 bucks an hour and have much savings let alone own a home or raise a family on those wages, and without the rank and file workers, the company couldn&#8217;t operate.  There, however, seems to be this strange contempt held by many for anyone who thinks that workers deserve more, so that remains a pipe dream.</p>
<p>An overhaul of the lobbying system is a good start, the marriage between power and money is very dangerous, and the erosion of federal regulations for big business seems to go hand-in-hand with the amount of money spent on lobbying efforts, and the amount of money that is needed to win an election.   Politicians who need money to run for office have to get corporate sponsorship to get into office.  The result is that no politician, or very few, are not pro-business.  Even if they say they aren&#8217;t the things they do in office don&#8217;t do all that much to fix anything because they are so beholden to the very thing they try to convince the public they are against.   A good example of this is the democrats, who voted down the bailouts and after some back room deals with the very people who screwed up the economy in the first place, turn around and vote to give them total access to the federal reserve with no oversight and no way of asking them where the money is going.   Or again, with healthcare, they talk about how bad the insurance companies are, then when they go to have a public option that the majority of the public supports, then they gut it, make it insignificant, and even give states a choice to opt out of it.   Which is great if you&#8217;re stuck in a red state like me because you know we&#8217;ll opt-out.</p>
<p>Also, they need to start taxing these people more.  The taxes were lifted based on trickle down economics, which obviously hasn&#8217;t worked.  The more money they let these people keep, the more they seem to horde it.   It&#8217;s almost like an addiction, a whole class of people obsessed with having gobs of money.  </p>
<p>Those things I feel would significantly reduce the power of businesses and restore a balance.   If things keep going the way they are, which I feel they will continue to do so, then I&#8217;m fairly sure the other 99% of the country is going to become increasingly more miserable.  I&#8217;m also fairly realistic in the knowledge that a lot of these things are becoming increasingly unlikely to occur.  Still, that doesn&#8217;t mean we should all just bend over and take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Scorpion and The Frog by Tyger</title>
		<link>http://www.nonpersons.com/2009/10/18/the-scorpion-and-the-frog/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nonpersons.com/?p=1028#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Very thorough article and well written, even if a bit lengthy. I don&#039;t agree with your views on Michael Moore, but you have a good grip on corporate reality.
You do not offer any concrete solutions, but I think you want to encourage more oversight and better laws to protect consumers and workers and to force corporations to be more responsible. Perhaps an overhaul of the lobbying system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thorough article and well written, even if a bit lengthy. I don&#8217;t agree with your views on Michael Moore, but you have a good grip on corporate reality.<br />
You do not offer any concrete solutions, but I think you want to encourage more oversight and better laws to protect consumers and workers and to force corporations to be more responsible. Perhaps an overhaul of the lobbying system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
